Over the past couple of weeks I have worked to reconstitute a Sun Sparcstation 1 (aka Sun 4/60) that I procured from UW Surplus way back in 1999, and which had been sitting on a shelf since then. The label on the front says it was priced at $0.00, however I think that was just the label the originating department slapped on it – I actually paid $18.99, tax included.
The disk drives had both died, but a SCSI2SD board (both V 5.2 and V6 / 2021) worked as substitutes, with little difference in performance. I set up both SunOS 4.1.4 (aka Solaris 1.4) and Solaris 2.7 (aka Solaris 7) – but the performance of the later Solaris was nearly intolerable. The video card that came with it was has a very odd Sun specific monochrome output, but I was able to acquire a color card at low cost off of eBay this year, and swap them out.
The machine has two Ethernet ports – one on the mainboard (le0) and the other on an SBus expansion board (le1) – the latter has a coax “thin net” connector. I don’t have that, but fortunately I have a couple of AUI cable to 10BaseT adapters so I was able to hook it up to my network.
These systems used a Mouse Systems optical mouse – and I got a mouse with the system, but not the mouse pad – and the pads are now essentially made of “unobtanium”. I found a site on the web where someone had printed their own – dark red horizontal stripes and vertical blue ones. It does not work very well, but at least it does work.
Somewhere along the line I also got a Sun SCSI cartridge tape drive shown in this photo. I have used that with PCs to recover cartridge data, but in this photo it is just for show.
The last 12 months I have been pretty busy working on my 1410 in FPGA project, and there is now more to share, though I have not done much actual work since February – been too busy playing with other “toys”. 8D
First, I finished working through all of the IBM 1410 and IBM 1415 Automated Logic Diagrams – generating VHDL and testing the results with test benches. [Note that this includes the built-in 1401 compatibility mode, activated at the flip of a switch.] That took most of 2020.
So, the CPU generation in VHDL is now more or less complete, and I added a hand coded memory module for memory, as core is kind of hard to find on an FPGA development board. 😉 I am currently using a Digilent Nexys 4, but I think it might have even fit on a Nexys 2 – there is plenty of room to spare, and there isn’t anything in the VHDL aside from, maybe, the memory implementation (though even that is pretty generic VHDL).
With this the CPU runs, at the very least, Unconditional branch (Jump), Halt, NOP and Set Word Mark instructions seemingly correctly – I haven’t tried any others. Somewhat surprisingly, aside from issues with the hand coded VHDL in triggers and the need to communicate pins tied to logic one or zero, the auto-generated VHDL works untouched.
I have updated the github repository for the C# database application that generates the VHDL from time to time (and which includes the complete database) at http://github.com/cube1us/IBM1410SMS
There is now a *new* repository, http://github.com/cube1us/IBM1410FPGA which holds the generated VHDL, some hand coded VHDL modules for certain SMS cards (typically for triggers, for example), the console and test benches I used along the way, and VHDL “Integration Tests” which are designed to be loaded onto the board – the current one being IntegrationTest3.
There will be, eventually, a third repository which will contain the C# code that “hosts” the IBM 1410 console and peripherals, communicating with the FPGA over a high speed serial over USB connection. I figured out that this should allow me to emulate peripherals without having to resort to sending data over Ethernet, SPI, I2C or the like. I have just started that, so it really isn’t at a point that there is much to share.
Once I have a console working (which will require a re-do of the console VHDL implementation, which right now communicates in ASCII, but should probably be using BCD), I should be able to pre-load into memory some of the CPU diagnostics, by loading a diagnostic routine into either my 1410 simulator (http://github.com/cube1us/1410), or Richard Cornwell’s emulator in SimH and then taking a snapshot of “core” to pre-load into the FPGA. At that point I expect I will be able to test the CPU pretty thoroughly. I hope and expect that will happen this year sometime.
Unfortunately, I do not have the ALDs (Automated Logic Diagrams) for the IBM 1414 I/O Synchronizers, but I do have the Instruction Logic Diagrams which should allow me to code VHDL to emulate card, tape and maybe eventually even disk functions, so those might take a while.
In early 2021, I converted the hard drives in my Pentium II computer which hosts my P/390E IBM mainframe processor card, which I call “Floppy Copy“. This machine boasts three different operating systems. Two are in support of its primary mission for copying floppies: Linux to host my Catweasel board (which may not see much future use, now that I have a Greaseweazle board), and Windows 98 for copying floppies using tools like IMD. It also has OS/2, in support of the P/390 board.
First some background: OS/2 had always acted a little wonky: I did the partitioning under Linux because OS/2 didn’t like to partition the 200GB drive. And then, having partitions of 2GB, 57GB, 57GB and 57GB, running OS/2 chkdsk on the last two 57GB partitions would sometimes clobber the first 57GB partition, for reasons I never understood – until I undertook this migration. (I still don’t quite understand why it never managed to clobber the 2GB FAT partition!)
So, off to Amazon I went, purchasing IDE to SATA adapters. The two from Startech and Kingwin worked fine. One from Sinloon worked, and the other did not work at all. In addition, I found, strangely, that the adapters would work with a 240GB drive, but not a 120GB drive. WTH?
So, then I went looking to see if the BIOS might be involved, and I found a BIOS update from Aug-17-1999 to Sep-09-2000. That cured the 120 GB problem. But then, in testing, I ran into the same kinds of issues on the 240GB drive I had seen on hard drives, with corruption after running OS/2 chkdsk.
Well, it turns out that this particular motherboard, a Chaintech 6BTM, has Ultra DMA-33 IDE ports –and only supports drives up to 137GB. Ahhh, so that was the problem.
I wanted to give OS/2 (and the P/390E) as much space as possible, so it got one 120GB drive. I tried and tried to move the drive partitions for Windows 98 and Linux over to a shared 120GB drive, but without success. The minute I created a second primary partition for Linux, Windows 98 would no longer boot. So, I simply imaged Windows 98 as is to a 120GB SSD (using only a fraction if it), OS/2 to a 120GB SSD and Linux to a 240GB SSD – because I already had it, having purchased it from before I learned about the 137GB limit.
Only one of the three adapters I had supported IDE master/slave. The other two had to be alone on their cable. I am using one of those two (Kingwin) permanently.
Having gotten things tested, I went about testing the IDE to SATA adapters one at a time in order to write reviews. While testing the Kingwin adapter, though, I decided to plug it in with power on. Unfortunately I had the power connector upside down, and as soon as it touched, the computer dropped power. Worse, I could not then power it on at all — completely dead. Ohhhh nooooooooo!!!
After unplugging the power cord for a couple of minutes, I could at least try and turn it on, but it would not start up – no beep, no nothing. Fearing the worst, I tested the power supply voltages – all fine. Ohhhhhh noooooooo!!!
After 10 minutes of panic, I started testing cards from that machine in a reasonably close relative, my AMD Athlon machine with an ASUS A7M266 mother board. Video card: good. IBM P390/E even passed its diagnostics. (Whew). So then I pulled all the cards out of the Pentium II as well as the IDE to SATA adapter I had been messing with at the time of the infraction, and the machine came to life!
I put all the cards in one by one, and stopped at the POST test. All good. Then, just for giggles, I hooked up that last IDE to SATA adapter – dead in the water, apparently fried. Embarrassing: I fried an adapter. The good news: it costs less than $10. Glad I purchased four of them. (I kept the Startech out in reserve because it is the only one of the four which worked and can be set for Master or Slave.)
Having discovered that the P390/E was happy in the AMD with the A7M266 motherboard, and that the motherboard has OS/2 support as well, so in May 2021 I migrated the P/390E to the AMD machine, and upgraded to OS/2 Warp 4.52, so now I have support for the full 240GB SSD.
Getting console output was going to require writing some VHDL of my own – I don’t have an actual IBM I/O Selectric available! I started out by reading through the material in the IBM 1415 Console CE Instruction manual (S223-2648) to design some finite state machines (FSM) to stand in for the console cams and feedback contacts.
The I/O Selectric uses cam contacts to control the timing of things like when the type ball tilt and rotate has completed, when shifts have completed, when spaces and backspaces have completed and when a carriage return has completed. It uses additional feedback contacts to indicate the parity of the received character, whether the keyboard is locked and the current shift state (upper or lower case).
To save time, particularly during simulation, I sped those timings up by a factor of 100. Mostly this just involved the console implementation module itself, via a VHDL generic parameter, but I also had to adjust the single shot on ALD 45.50.01.1 as well.
The Selectric also uses a set of solenoids to initiate actions such as printing a character, locking/unlocking the keyboard, spacing and backspacing, carriage return and shifting from/to upper and lower case.
After writing some simple state machines for the cam timing, I enabled the normal stop print-out in the CPU via a test bench signal, and then used simple VHDL with “wait” statements to check for the outputs and provide the input signals required by the CPU in order to test my understanding under simulation.
The first thing I came across was a latch on page 126.96.36.199 that did not have a reset. In real world hardware this can work because (unless it enters a meta-stable state on power up) it will be in one state or the other. However, under simulation that does not work – it ends up as an undefined signal – so I added a Program Reset signal to the latch at location 4A on that page to compensate.
The next thing I saw in the traces – which I hadn’t expected, but probably should have – was activation of the carriage return solenoid so I had to add the FSM for that. (Note: The I/O Selectric implements a carriage return by returning the type ball to the home position and initiating a paper (line) feed operation).
This was then followed by an “S” character – and the fun began. The interface feedback signals from the Selectric are full of names that end NC or NO (normally closed, normally open). Now one might expect that these refer to the state of those signals at idle, but the cam contacts aside, that quickly got pretty confusing – more so because most of these signals (except those that drive the solenoids) are active low. In addition, the keyboard lock signal is -W on the CPU diagrams, but +W on the 1415 Console Printer contact diagram page 40.30.01.0, and a couple of the feedback signals from the Selectric to the CPU are marked as -B level on the ALD page — but are actually -V level, as can be determined from page 40.30.01.1 as well.
Eventually I came to the realization that the best way of handling the NC vs. NO +/- confusion was to more or less ignore it, and instead use the signal name and level to determine what state a given signal ought to be in at a given time. That helped a lot. Once I got ordinary characters working right, I proceeded to code the state machines for space/backspace, and shifts.
Shifts were a little problematic at first, because the CPU drops the solenoid drive the instant it sees the feedback signal from the Selectric – which didn’t give me a clock cycle to save the new shift state.
Once I got that working under simulation, I turned my attention to getting that I/O from the Selectric to a PC for display. A few months back I had looked into using a MicroBlaze soft CPU to do that, but looking at how my Digilent Nexys 4 USB to PC connection works, I discovered I can run successfully at speeds of at least 115,200 bits/second, which should be plenty enough to run a simple flag bit/type protocol for not only console output, but also switch inputs, printer output, card input, tape I/O and disk I/O – perhaps adding a silo or two for lower priority devices. This is a huge simplification over what I had been thinking would be necessary.
But at this point there was also a little bit of extra work required. initially I had written the VHDL to use character output for the UART, but I subsequently discovered that VHDL doesn’t have a consistently synthesizable way to convert from character to std_logic_vector, so now that type-ball characters are specified as std_logic_vector bit strings, instead of ASCII characters – which is probably better in the long run, anyway. Mostly I am using the same encoding I used from the IBM 1410 simulator software, which in turn was derived from Joseph Newcomers IBM 1401 emulation software.
Once I had tested the UART VHDL, found at Nandland, I put together a test to combine that with the CPU and generate a bitstream for the FPGA. I had two small problems in the process – trivial ones, really. The first was that I keep forgetting to wire signal “+P SPECIAL +12V POWER FOR OSC” (which then feeds “+P SPECIAL +12V FOR REL DRIVERS”) to logic ONE. The second issue was that while most of the buttons on the Digilent Nexys4 are active high, the Soft CPU reset button – which I feed to the 1410 CPU Computer Reset signal is active LOW – wasted an entire day on that one. 8(.
One I did that, I obtained the following result: A printout of:
S 00009 00007 00007 .c … _ _
This is exactly the expected result (one which I had already observed in simulation). The “c” is a 1410 blank (different from the console space operation), and will print as a “b” using a PC-side application. Also, the three periods after that, which are the contents of the A Data Register, B Channel and Assembly Channel, have wordmarks – which you cannot see in the PuTTY output because they get backspaced over. Finally, the last two characters, the channel unit select and unit number registers for Channel 1 are wiped out by the backspace/underscore combination that occurs because they seem to be uninitialized, and therefore have bad parity.
Next on the list will be cleaning up the latches in the VHDL code which are currently tracking upper/lower case, tilt, rotate, space/backspace, and the character to be sent to the UART, and maybe a couple of more, as well as working on the PC side console application – starting with designing the protocol I will use for PC / IBM 1410 communication.
What with the Thanksgiving holiday and all (even though it was spent at home, ’cause 2020), it took several days to ferret out the issue where simulation of a power on reset followed by START worked, but on the FPGA that failed. Of course it was bound to be an issue with triggers. However, I used the Integrated Logic Analyzer (ILA) to confirm that issue before I changed anything. Sure enough, card type DEZ needed the same adjustments as DEY: I changed it so that the transition of the AC SET input was required to occur after the transition of GATE ON / GATE OFF. At the same time, I moved all of that logic inside the FPGA clock transition section, to make it synchronous with the FPGA clock. That fixed the issue, which occurred on page 188.8.131.52
So now, after I load the FPGA, all I need do is press START and I see the correct waveform. (Also note that the transition of the output to ON (NEXT TO LAST LOGIC GATE) immediate turns off GATE ON – because that is exactly how it is wired. So first we see -S (active low) STOP AT F . LOGIC GATE D at about 320 into the trace. Note that GATE ON is already present, however, the trigger is held off by the “DCRFORCE” input coming from block 3B until STOP AT F . LOGIC GATE D goes true. Next, we see CLOCK PULSE 2 appear (but it gets inverted before it us used for ACSET, so it essentially matches CLOCK PULSE 1) at 389 on the diagram. Then at 392, the trigger sets, NEXT TO LAST LOGIC GATE goes true, and GATE ON is removed.
Decoding Memory Addresses
The IBM 1410 storage address register (STAR) is a five position two-out-of-five code register. However, it is not used altogether to select an address. On a read, all of the 10,000 position core memory segments are read, in parallel, each to its own B data register position. So, for a 40K machine, it has 4 B data registers, for 0-9999, 10000-19999, 20000-29999 and 30000-39999. On a read, the ten thousands position of the memory address is used to select one of the B data registers to gate onto the B Channel. During the write portion of a memory cycle (to change memory, or to regenerate memory if only a read is required), the ten thousands position is used to decide which B data register to update, if any, before the write portion of the memory cycle. The other B data registers retain their original contents from the read cycle.
At present, rather than simulating the full core plane of the IBM 1410, I chose to implement memory, for now, using a binary address and (probably) an array of 10K FPGA Block RAM segments. This means that the binary addressed RAM for the FPGA IBM 1410 uses a 14 bit address (to cover 0-9999), with memory arranged in the same 10K sections.
The inputs into this decoder are the -Y MEM AR UP/TP/HP/THP signals, which are in two-out-of-five code. The output from the decoder is a 14 bit binary address, 0 – 9999. This was implemented “brute force” by decoding each of the positions to the appropriate binary number, so the UP decodes to 0 – 9 in a 14 bit binary number, the TP decode to 00 – 90 (by tens) in a 14 bit binary number, and so on. Then the four binary numbers are simply added together in the VHDL – leaving the implementation of the adder for the tool chain to figure out.
Memory – and a Startup Issue
Next I created a simple set of Block RAM modules (BRAM) along with a VHDL wrapper for the 40K main core unit, accepting the aforementioned addresses in 2 out of 5 code, the Ten Thousands position (so that eventually it can tell if it is the 40K main core or the 60K Z Frame core), inhibit signals, and output sense signals. In order to more easily generate the necessary BRAM enable and write enable signals, I also brought out the MY_X_RD_1 and MY_X_WR_1 signals.
After some fussing I got my BRAM module working under simulation, but ran into an odd problem where during startup the system would overwrite location 00001 with garbage (and presumably 10001, 20001 and 30001 as well) because the system was left in Logic Gate B (LGB) state during the power on reset that then proceeding through a memory cycle once the power on reset was complete triggering the computer reset- thereby writing those locations with uninitialized garbage. (Computer reset will finish a cycle if it is encountered mid cycle to avoid corrupting core.)
I temporarily disabled memory writes, and then found I could successfully execute my halt instruction (WM/. WM/. in locations 1 and 2) under simulation AND on the FPGA.
The startup issue was interesting. I had supposed that the power on reset signal issued on ALD page 12.65.01.1 would start OFF, come ON during the power on reset, and then turn OFF again. However, that was having the undesirable effect of letting the system progress from LGA to LGB during the power on reset as mentioned above. Some study of the aforementioned ALD, along with the IBM 1415 console manual (the power on switch is located there) made me realize I had misunderstood.
That power on reset signal is asserted during power on to keep the system in a reset state (and thus in LGA) for an RC constant of about 500ms. Then, after that, the signal goes to logic 0, triggering the one-shot at block 2D to do a computer reset. At that point, the machine is in LGA, and the computer reset will leave it there.
Since I already have a system initialization VHDL process in the FPGA VHDL logic, it was easy to manage the power on reset signal there – indeed, the two may eventually become one, as they both have the same purpose of getting some stuff set up before letting the IBM 1410 CPU start.
This tested OK under both simulation and on the FPGA, though I have not yet verified that the FPGA is actually writing the contents back into the BRAM.
Next up: testing write by setting a wordmark somewhere (to verify read/write), and then halting, and a simple loop – both of which should be possible with my current VHDL by just changing the RAM initial values.
Update: The instructions sequence, starting at location 1, of setting a word mark at location 8 (which takes locations 1 through 6), a NOP instruction (reading out the set word mark instruction needs a wordmark on the character after) and then a period (halt without the word mark) behaves correctly. Wohoo! I have something of a CPU.
Having completed the pass through the ALDs, the next thing I undertook was some cleanup work. The goal was to be able to generate an HDL “group” that contained ALL of the usable HDL pages.
The first step of that was to mark pages I didn’t want as no HDL generation – a relatively recent addition to the application. Then I went through and found all of the switches, and regenerated the affected pages to use update code that used notations in what is ordinarily the signal level fields of the ALD logic blocks associated with the switches (but show up as thinks like DK 2 – meaning switch deck two of a multi-layer rotary switch). I also had to fix up the associated test benches and groups to use the new signal names.
Then I took a shot at generating the whole shebang. I ran into three issues. There were a couple of pages I had skipped that had to do with auto-restart. Dealing with those was simply a matter of marking them to not generate. Next, I ran into an issue with page 13.72.06.1 – which turned out to be a missing page having to do with compute disable cycles for systems with “fast” file (disk) systems. Finally, the ALDs had several cases where the same IBM 1415 console lamp location was specified. I separated them arbitrarily – I don’t seem to have any specific information to help me decide.
With those fixes I was able to begin simulation. At first the power on reset wasn’t working right – the 20ms single shot on page 12.65.01.1 wasn’t triggering. This is really a simulation issue, I think – putting in a 30ns wait at the beginning of the simulation dealt with that.
The next issue was that after the reset, pressing the start key did not start the clock – the STOP LATCH stayed on. That in turn kept the clock from starting (ILD Figure 1). That in turn led to noticing that there was no START KEY PULSE when the start key was pressed in the simulation.
Part of the issue was tracked down to the fact that I don’t yet have a console printer emulation in place, and the console contact signals were inconsistent (both C1 and C2 normally closed and normally open signals were false), so I “fudged” it so the cam contact signals would indicate it was not in a cycle. That helped – and was the sort of thing I expect might need attention.
The next issue with the START KEY PULSE signal was that the CONS STOP PRINT COMPLETE signal was 0 – as though it was in the middle of a console stop print out. That was traced down to the Console STARTPRINT switch (page 44.10.01.1) which is unusual in that its N output (usually reserved for an active HIGH signal) is active LOW in this instance. That got me to the point where the START KEY PULSE appeared, and the machine went from Logic Gate B (perhaps it should have been at A?) through Logic Gate E, and which point Master Error was asserted and things stopped.
The error lamps were multitudinous, but the lamp that was first in line in the time line was the B Register Reset Error. The B register gets the contents from memory, and if it does not reset before then, that is an error (otherwise it might return the previous character, or some combination of the previous character and the current one).
Have I ….
By now, if you have been following along, you know what comes next. Yup. Triggers. In particular, card type DEY, used for generating the clock pulses and also for the logic clock (A, B, C, D, ….). Based on the waveforms I saw in the System Fundamentals manual, I had supposed that the AC input signals for set and reset would remain at logic zero until the gate had been turned on, and then pulsed. However, that turned out to be wrong, and it caused the system to advance into Logic Gate B immediate after reset, which caused the missing reset of the B register, among other things. What the system actually does is that the AC Set signal may already be at logic one when the gate on signal comes along – but since the AC Set signal is capacitively coupled, in that case the AC Set does NOT trigger the trigger. That does not happen until, while the gate is on, the AC Set signal transitions from zero to one.
The CPU Executes Its First Instruction
Upon fixing that, a whole bunch of stuff worked. Upon power up restart, the memory address register – the MAR – and the IAR – are already set to 1. So when START is pressed, that is the character read from storage. The instruction I am force feeding to it is the HALT instruction. Then the IAR gets incremented by 1, loaded into the MAR and the following character is read out (and, since I am force feeding it, the character is exactly the same). Since it has a word mark (WM), the system knows that this is a plain halt, and, lo and behold, the system halts.
This success, though, means that I have to go back and test (though not regenerate) all of the pages that use card type SMS_DEY. They should all be fine.
The IBM 1410 executes its first halt instruction
Well, actually, not all of the SMS_DEY usages were fine – there were four test benches with issues. In each case the AC Set or AC Reset signal was changed simultaneously with a collector pull off signal (DCRFORCE in the VHDL) which caused problems given how I coded SMS_DEY.vhdl. Adding a slight delay between the two (which is realistic) fixed the test benches.
Try and Fit onto the FPGA
With that, I made a couple of tweaks to a copy of the Integration2_tb.vhdl to become Integration2_fpga.vhdl and tried to synthesize it. There were a few issues:
A couple of signals had no drivers because they did not appear as outputs from the sheet: -S F CH FILE OP is used on 184.108.40.206, ostensibly coming from 13.74.04.1 . 13.74.04.1 has the latter ECO (251849 vs. 251824). Also, the card location chart on page 220.127.116.11 does not show the gates that appear on the ALD. For now, I changed 18.104.22.168 to use signal -S FILE OP instead, and changed 13.74.01.1 to output that signal to 22.214.171.124
Similarly, on the same two pages, 13.47.01.1 outputs -S FILE OP.D CY.EXTENSION but this got mangled into -S FILE OP.DLY.EXTENSION on page 126.96.36.199. It goes to the same gate as #2 above, so it may turn out to be bogus.
A signal +S BLOCK USE A CH WM is used on page 15.49.02.1, ostensibly originating from page 188.8.131.52. It does not originate there (or anywhere else). Here I changed the signal to “LOGIC ONE” on the destination page, and removed it from the origin page (which has the later ECO, at 253469 vs.251829).
Fixing numbers 2 through 4 was easy, if tedious – I also regenerated and ran the associated test benches. For a little while I thought #1 was just a matter of Vivado not recognizing the my signal named FPGA_CLK was a clock, but found it was indeed recognized. So I dropped that for easier prey…
There were a bunch of references in the Vivado synthesis log complaining about unconnected signal “GROUND”. This was because it appears as an input to sheets – most of them using it for capacitor input, or, in once case, a switch input that the generated HDL ignores in both cases. So, I changed the app to ignore that signal name, as it does with “LOGIC ONE” and “LOGIC ZERO”. Some of the triggers map a signal named GROUND to an *output* so that they can use it as a logic one internally – those I have left — for now. Interestingly, there were two more pages that had this issue that Vivado did NOT call out with a warning – but then failed when I regenerated IntegrationTest2.
The rest of the unconnected inputs I ignored for now – mostly they are cases where a bit vector is input to a page that does not use all the bits. Heck, that really should not be issuing a warning!
Next up was InvShiftRegister.vhdl. The way I had done the shift, one bit was “undefined” for a while – or conceivably could be. I changed the assignment and tested the affected pages again (39.10.01.1, 02.1, 03.1). No page HDL changes required for that. But what was weird was that this exact same assignment is used in ShiftRegister.vhdl, but there it did not generate the warning – but was not called out (see the discussion regarding GROUND, above, where the same kind of thing occurred).
Loop “D” Loops
Another issue that cropped up during synthesis, and became roadblocks when I tried to generate the bitstream for the FPGA involved a couple of apparent combinatorial loops. The application prevents those from being an issue on a single page, but there is no check across pages. Two such loops showed up, one involving +S CONSOLE PRINTER NOT BUSY and the other involving the A Channel WM bit.
It took me a couple of days to learn how to get the tooling too leave enough information in during synthesis so that I could see the problem. Setting the Xilinx Vivado “-flatten_hierarchy” to “none” made things much easier.
The console issue was easy to fix: I just manually inserted a “D” flip flop on page 45.50.08.1. The A Channel one was harder. The first time I looked at the schematic +S A CH NOT WM BIT was in the loop, so I put a “D” flip flop on that signal on page 15.39.08.1. But then the issue moved to +S CH WM BIT, so I put a second flip flop there. But then the issue moved again, this time to +B A CH WM BIT. Looking at the page I quickly saw that these were all fed from the logic block at 4D, so I took out the other two flip flops and put one at the output of block 4D, which cured the problem, both during synthesis and when generating the bitstream.
With normal settings, the design takes up 2858 LUT (look up table) cells and 1628 flip flops. With flatten_hierarcy set to non, it takes up 4001 LUTs and 1805 flip flops (two of which are the ones I added to fix the loops).
Doing some “greps” on the source, I found I had 1200 D flip flops that I had inserted (generated for on-page combinatorial loops — almost all latches), about 128 triggers, not counting the registers needed for implementing one-shots and delays, so the flip flop of 1807 count seems about right.
At one point the flip flop count had been as high as 2046 with a smaller LUT count, but while looking for the combinatorial loop issue I made a change to the VHDL for trigger card type DEY to bring what it thinks of as a DC Set or Reset into the section edge triggered by the 100MHz FPGA clock which actually made things smaller.
The FPGA on the Digilent Nexys 4 is an Artix 7 XCA100T, which can has 15,850 slices – each of which has 8 FF, and which has 101,440 cells. The report says I am using under 6% of the LUT’s and under 1.5% of the flip flops. I hadn’t realized this chip was as big as it is. I should have plenty of room for memory (BRAM with some ROM, too, maybe), channels, console, reader/punch and printer along with a debug core and either or a microBlaze co-processor or an I2C interface (or some such) to connect an Arduino to talk IP to my PC).
A Halting Start
Programming the results into the FPGA, with some code to map the START and COMPUTER RESET buttons sort of works – but unlike the simulation, where all that was necessary after a power on-reset was to press START, here I have to do START, then COMPUTER RESET, then START again – so something is not quite right (and it might be one of the other trigger types needs fixing). [The START KEY PULSE is indeed present during the first START.] Still, it apparently successfully executes the HALT instruction, which is a good step forward.
I also learned about a new tool: the Vivado Integrated Logic Analyzer, which can capture digital signals, and then communicate them back to the PC using a JTAG connection. Handy as heck.
With the completion of Volume X, I have completed Phase II of this project. Phase I was to develop an application to enter data from the Automated Logic Diagrams (ALDs) and generate VHDL from that.
Phase II was to test the generated VHDL for each page, to make sure it was “reasonable”. Early on in the process, I took to using the Instructional Logic Diagrams (ILDs) to guide the testing – which was a tremendous help, though there were some errors and omissions in the ILDs. I also used the CE manuals, particularly the System Fundamentals manual, the Preliminary Core Storage manual and the IBM 1415 console manuals to guide testing as well.
Post the VHDL for the generated pages and test benches to a new project on Github
Update the Xilinx Vivado software on my machine – something I was hesitant to do mid-stream to either the latest release of Vivado, or their new tool, Vitis.
Create an HDL entity that combines all the pages, and throw that at the Xilinx toolchain to see how much space it will need on the FPGA – if it will even fit on the development board I already own.
Add a feature to the a application to assign each page to a subsystem, for collective/group generation, based on the existing group generation: console memory, registers, CPU Channels (A, B, C, D), CPU Instruction execution, and I/O Channels (E, F) are some possibilities. (Integration above that initial level will probably be manual)
Fix up any multi-deck rotary switches so that the deck is identified for all instances, so they can fit together. (For step 3 I may have to “fake” it.) Otherwise, when brining together pages with different decks of the same switch, they compete. The application has already been modified to do most of the work.
Decide if I am going to snag console characters internally, or via the actual IBM 1410 / IBM 1415 interface signals – hard to test an IBM 1410 without a console typewriter, and build a simulation to try that out. That might be enough to use for simulated testing of other components.
Translate the console interface onto a PC via embedded “IP” as they call it.
Do something about print/punch/card read/tape – probably based on the ILD’s. That may be a while – I can test an awful lot with just the console.
Things will proceed much more slowly now as I deal with holiday activities and some fun things I put on hold to focus on testing the ALDs.
A Special Latch
The beginning of Volume X is the B data register. This is actually 4 8-bit registers for a basic IBM 1410 – one for each 10K of core storage. These registers are a set of latches with open collector outputs, only one (for a given 10K) of which has its outputs (for data readout and inhibit, independently) enabled at any one time. Most latches are comprised of the same kind of gate, typically NAND and NOR. The DGM card type used for the B data register is specific to the B data register. But instead of being two NAND gates or two NOR gates, this one is an OR gate with a NAND gate which has an additional inverter (so, and AND gate), electrically. (The System Fundamentals manual depicts it as an OR gate followed by a second OR gate).
Internally, a diode OR circuit is followed by a diode AND circuit and two inverters after the diode AND circuit (T9 and T8). The output of T8 is the input to the first OR gate, as well as feeding two NOR circuits to gate the output. (The “OR” shows up as a “-A” logic block on the ALD and the “AND circuit with its two inverters shows up as a “-O” logic block. -A ==> +O ==> OR and -O ==> +A ==> AND). At least, that is how I modeled and test it, based on my analysis of the card’s circuits.
Inhibitions tied up in knots
I took way way too long to test the generation of inhibit signals out of the combination of loading a character into core from the assembly channel and any inhibit that would otherwise occur due to character regen (ALD pages 36.10.01.1 – 36.10.04.1, Info Input Gating)
The ILD depicted this equation: Do NOT inhibit if the output of the regen is a 1 bit OR the assembly channel is being loaded AND the assembly channel has a 1 bit.
This makes perfect sense. What got me tied up in knots is that all of the inputs are -Y inputs (inverted) and the output is also inverted. Normally I have dealt with that very easily, but not this time. I ended up thinking the logic through myself in order to realize what the (inverted) output ought to be given what the inhibit line actually does, testing that, and then, lo and behold, confirmed that it really did match the ILD.
More on the 1410’s Inhibitions
Page 37.11.01.1 – 37.11.04.1 also confused me for a bit. These ALDs take the inhibit lines and then gate them – but all with negative logic.
From a “what ought to happen” perspective, the inhibit line should only be driven if 1) writing the bit is to be inhibit (set to 0) AND 2) that the corresponding core plane area (0-5K or 5K-10K) is being gated.
I had initially entered card type, DFW, into the database as an “AND” because that is what the waveforms in the system fundamentals manual depicted. (In other words, inhibit the writing of a “1” if and only if conditions #1 AND #2 above are present.) On the other hand, the system fundamentals refers to this card as a -A (negative AND) gate, which is usually actually referring to NOR logic (IBM at this stage in time, disregarded the output inverter when considering these things).
However, when I looked at it, that confused me. That would mean that the -Y output line would be 1 (no inhibit) only if that bits inhibit input was off (logic 1 0 no inhibit) AND that section of core was NOT being gated. That made no sense to me. Furthermore, the ILD figure 49 is confusing, because it shows the inhibit output being an AND of NOT driving the OTHER section of core AND’ed the corresponding inhibit line for that bit. But it would not make sense to drive the inhibit line when no write cycle was taking place (no Z Pulse).
So, I analyzed the circuit. It starts off with a diode OR gate (anodes facing the input signals – so either one being logic 1 (0 volts) – results in the output junction between the two being close to 0v. This is then followed ay an inverter, turning it into a NOR gate – more or less standard SDTDL diode-transistor logic. But then that part is followed by an inverting power driver – so we have an OR gate.
Electrically, this means that the -V output is a 1 (NO inhibit) if either a) the input bit is a 1 [since in that case the earlier read of that location left it at 0 and we want it to change it] OR b) that section of core isn’t being gated (in which case we don’t want to be driving anything, including its inhibit winding).
The output is 0 (inhibit writing a 1 bit) only if a) the input bit is a 1 bit – the input is at a -V level, so negative voltage AND b) the corresponding section of core is being driven – this input is also -V level – so a negative voltage – resulting in a negative voltage on the driven inhibit output.
Conclusion: the system fundamentals diagrams with waveforms showing an AND gate from an electrical perspective is incorrect: this is an OR gate, electrically speaking (i.e., the waveforms are upside down) – which makes sense because this gate has -V inputs and outputs.
I don’t know if this really matters, because it will be needed to know which bits to write as “1” bits into the simulated memory if I use a memory structure like the actual IBM 1410. If, on the other hand, I just use the read/write signals and the data bits, the inhibit line signals won’t be used.
Here we go with Triggers — Again
Page 184.108.40.206 is straightforward enough – it is the memory read timing. When a cycle is started, first the B register is reset. 425 ns that reset signal is removed, and the Y Read line is driven. 280 ns after that, the X Read line is driven. 1100 ns after that (with some possible additional delays), the sense line is strobed.
All of this involves -yup, you guessed it – triggers – and on a new card type, DEM. I set that up based on triggers I had already done – very little effort. I chose the inputs and outputs based on the little timing diagram and block diagram shown in the system fundamentals manual. Below I also have noted whether a given signal is on the “ON” side or “OFF” side.
System Fund (DEM)
Pin assignments for card type DEM, as shown in the IBM 1410 System Fundamentals and SMS Volume I Schematics
One thing is odd right away: The Gate Off signal is on the “ON” side but the corresponding “AC Reset” is on the OFF side, and vice versa. That is clearly not correct. But because this page and the following two – the only places where this card type is used in the IBM 1410 – all have both gate signals tied to logic one, that of itself made no difference.
Now, compare that to what we see for card type DEZ, which has a common AC Set line, but otherwise has a very similar circuit (cross connected PNP transistors) but with a -6V to 0V swing for card type DEM. Here I ordered them by function for easy comparison with the DEM table, above.
System Fund (DEZ)
AC Set/Reset (Common)
Pin assignments for card type DEZ, as shown in the IBM 1410 System Fundamentals and SMS Volume I Schematics.
Notice that DEZ has the negative going DC reset on the OFF side on the schematic. This makes sense – the DC reset is an active negative signal. It turns the corresponding transistor ON, causing its output to be pulled close to 0V (logic ONE). Same issue with DC Set. It also has the Gate signals on the opposite side, as those signals are positive going, and so turn the corresponding PNP transistor OFF resulting in a logic ZERO on that side.
At first I tried tried switching the assignments for pins A and Q (the On and Off outputs). That almost worked – the circuit is essentially symmetric. However, this memory timing page has a little wrinkle: if the address is more than 39,999 the memory timing is suppressed in the B frame, because memory 40K and above is in the Z frame. It does that via a pull-off condition on the trigger at 5F via the output of the block at 5G being logic ONE. That meant that “Q” had to be the “OFF” output. So, in the end, I flipped the outputs back to their original pins, and swapped the various inputs from side to side (fixing the obvious gate on/off and AC set/reset signals to match), ending up with the following, which passed the test I had coded based on the ILD perfectly.
My DEM Implementation – corrected
Corrected DEM Pinout Designations used in VHDL module SMS_DEM
So now we have the negative going DC Reset signal on the OFF side where it belongs, and the positive going Reset signals on the ON side where they belong.
Here is the resulting timing diagram during simlation. The test code does a Computer Reset at the beginning of each iteration of the test 0 the first 3 do not set the conditions to start a read cycle, but the fourth one does. This matches up reasonably well with the timing diagram shown on figure 48 in the ILDs. (Not shown is the suppressed read with the Ten Thousands position 8 bit set.)
Note the long long delays here – about 425 ns for the B register reset (and activating the Y Read line), another 280 ns before activating the X read line, and then 1100 ns before deactivating the X and Y read lines. At 10ns per cell, that means 42 + 28 + 110 shift register cells. The Sense timing will add another 310 to 580 + 425 ns, and the write cycle will add 150 ns + 280 ns + 1200 ns – the grand total being 474 cells. Hopefully, I will have room without having to fudge them to preserve “slices” (each slice contains 8 flip flops and there are over 15,000 slices available in the chip on my development board.)
Oh, and have I … never mind. 8)
Reset and what was that?
Page 220.127.116.11 is pretty simple: a negative going read condition signal goes through two delay lines of 310ns and 0ns (which for now I have modeled as 10ns) to the AC set input of a trigger.
But there is a quirk: The first delay line is non inverting fed by a negative going input that goes through two inverters to get there – so it starts out as a 1. But the delay line initializes itself to 0 – it takes 310 ns for it to reflect that original input. During that time the output goes through the second delay line and manages to fire the trigger and activate the sense strobe (say what?). In the real world that would just result in garbage input to the sense amps.
The fix, in the test, was to wait for that all to settle out before activating the computer reset signal, but it took 15 minutes to figure out what was going on. In the original machine there is a delay of 25 microseconds between power good and issuing the system wide reset, which would take care of this just fine in the real world.
One issue I have seen in all of the memory timings is that the setup time for the triggers is quite long, and so pulses end up being longer than they should be. The Sense pulse should be somewhere just about 500ns according to the waveform diagram on ILD figure 48 and the . Mine is 525 ns. I am going to have to watch the relationship between some of these and the logic gates to make sure they don’t last too long or start too late.
With this, the memory pages are done, leaving just the IBM 1415 Console – the “fun” there will be the Selectric I/O portions.
The “Ghosts” in the 1410 Mode Switch
The IBM 1410 Mode switch had 6 labeled positions: C.E. (at the bottom), I/E Cycle, Address Set, Run, Display and Alter. Naturally there were 6 detents on the rotary switch that accompanied those positions.
Now, when entering the 1410 bootstrap, the usual sequence was to set the mode switch to address set, press Start, enter 0000 with the Load switch to +1, turn the Mode switch to display, press Start, enter 00000, wait for a bunch of “bbbbbbbbbb” to type out, press margin release (which allowed one to then enter multiple word marks later), turn the Mode Switch to Alter, press Start, enter the tape boot sequence (A WordMark+L % B 0 0 0 0 1 2 $ WordMark+N), turn the Mode switch to Run, press Computer Reset and then Start.
Note that I never mentioned pressing the Stop button. Well today, in looking at the ALD, I noticed that the switch actually has twelve positions (one of which is not actually shown on the ALD as it should be on block 5E). Every other switch position generates signal “-Y CONSOLE MODE SW STOP POS”. So, whenever the Mode switch is turned between two positions that are labeled (and have detents) it passes through another un-detented “ghost” position which activates a Stop condition. Clever.
Fits with Switches
Switches have been kind of problematic all along. Most of them signal active low when they are ON – so much so that rotary switches take that as their default. But momentary, toggle and “ALT” (which act like toggle) switches are mixed bag.
On top of that, switches, especially rotary switches, have multiple decks, and it is important to keep the switch positions aligned, bit wise, to make life easier later. So it took a bit to track down the switch decks on other pages and make sure they were in sync. Fortunately, only one of them was not: the Check Control switch deck on page 18.104.22.168 .
This sheet has toggles set up three different ways: The “Write Inhibit” toggle (which is actually unlabeled) creates an active LOW signal (logic 0, negative voltage) when OFF. It is the only switch in the bunch which works with the default settings. The “Auto Start” toggle creates an active LOW signal from the N pin when ON – in other words, active low. The “Inhibit PO” (print out) and “Asterisk Insert” switches create active LOW signals from their T output when OFF – also a sign of active low. It took me more than an hour to get my head around all of the toggle switches.
Page 40.10.03.1 as a bunch of switches. Most of the rotary switch decks and even the toggle switches (except 1 of each switch type) on this page have the grand task of turning on the “OFF NORMAL” lamp when any switch is not in what IBM was deemed the normal operating position. Two of the rotary switch decks (address entry deck 2 and storage scan deck 3) connect up in a kind of “and” gate via an isolating diode.
The Off Normal Lamp is also tricky: it lights when it’s input is logic 0 – being driven directly by the switches which are connected together. This ended up being the first “DOT” function that needed to be something other than AND or OR (besides the fact that it is fed from a mixed bag, so the HDL generation code punts that to an OR). What it in fact needs to be is a NAND: any logic 0 input (negative voltage) lights the lamp.
All told it took me more than four hours to get code generation patched up to segregate switch decks based on the info in their logic blocks (which IBM puts in the input and output level fields (which normally contain things like “S”, “B”, and “Y”)), fix other pages, write the test code and get my understanding of the switches operations to get it all working right.
I’d bet they will give me fits when I try and integrate multiple toggle switch decks together, too.
Fun with Latches
Most of the latches in the IBM 1410 are pretty straight-forward: the left side is usually the “Reset” side – a zero on an input to that side usually resets the latch, and the right side is usually the “Set” side – a zero on an input on that side usually sets the latch. Of course, one ought to avoid having 0 inputs on both sides, which would result in undefined behavior.
But sometimes latches can be reset another way: by having all ONE inputs on the SET side – which results in a zero on the reset side. Such is the case with the Console Stop Cond Latch on page 44.10.01.1. There is a “DOT” connection on one input of the “set” side – which happens to also be the output of the reset side. Two signals can reset the latch: Program Reset or the Inhibit Print Out switch. Easy enough. But testing this page got tricky because that DOT-ed connection is also an output (+S CONS STOP PRINT COMP COND).
When I first started testing, I just made that the NOT’ed output of the latch – since it was the output of the reset side of the latch. HOWEVER, that particular signal is also asserted if either of the two reset lines mentioned above is asserted – regardless of the state of the latch. Took me waaaaaaay too long to figure that out until common sense kicked in: that signal should be asserted if either the latch is reset OR either of the reset lines is asserted, stopping the printout.
“There You Go Again”
The quip from Ronald Reagan seems to apply to triggers. In this case, card type TAM, on page 45.20.02.1 – the console Y matrix (state machine) for dealing with 5 character addresses. In this case, the card type has its own VHDL file to implement it, because it is a trigger. Generally, I derived those from the logic and timing diagrams in the System Fundamentals – which for TAM is figures 113 and 114 on page 95. But something seemed odd, looking at the following connections for Y2, using those figures as a guide
Gate ON 1
AC Set 1
MX Y Drive
Gate ON 2 (Pin F -really E)
MX ADDR DRIVE
AC Set 2 (Pin E – really F)
Gate OFF 1
Alter . Y2 . MX X6 OR Y2 . MX X1A
AC Reset 1
MX Addr Drive
Gate OFF 2
Set Y3 (MX X6 . Y2) OR (Not Alter . Not Read . Not Write . MX x6 . Y2)
AC Reset 2
MX Y Drive
Page 45.20.02.1 Y2 Trigger Inputs
As I was trying to make my tests work, I actually constructed the table above. It seemed “off”. The AC inputs are capacitator coupled (and not just for speed up – there is no parallel resist0r). Checking the Y3 trigger showed the same pattern, so it wasn’t just that the ALD had them reversed. Then, reading through the description in the IBM 1415 console manual, S223-2648, there was no hint of this situation.
Finally, I looked at the circuit diagram. Sure enough, E is the GATE input and F is the AC Pulse input – the System Fundamentals manual had reversed them. A quick use of my application’s card report revealed that this page was also the first time I had seen Gate On 2 / AC Set 2 used.
Fortunately, trivial to fix: all I had to do was go into my application card pin editor and swap the HDL signal name mappings for pins E and F (ACSET2 and GATEON2).
Have I… (“well…. never mind” — Paul Simon).
The 1415 Console I/O Selectric
Triggers and Latches and Cams – Oh My! (And latches driving triggers, driving latches – yeesh). Lots going on here, that made for some slow testing.
I will have some choices to make as to where I decide to “pick off” console output characters – either at the BCD level or emulate the various cams and solenoids. Of course, eventually I’d like to do the latter – frankly, I am a bit surprised that nobody has done that before. The I/O Selectric interface for inputs from cams happens on various pages, but the output magnet selection can be found on ILD figure 85. But for expediency, during my early testing I may decide to do it at the console character level.
However, while entering page 45.50.06.1 I found an error in the ILD. The IBM 1415 console manual, S223-2648 and the ALD agree that magnet R2A is “picked” when the input bits include either the 8 bit or not the 4 bit. The ILD incorrectly shows it being not the 8 bit (incorrect) or not the 4 bit (but the little chart at the bottom right of figure 85 does show R2A correctly.)
More errors were found on the ILD while working on page 45.50.07.1. For solenoid T1, the logic diagram shows a term in the equation of not 4 bit. The ALD and the table show that as not the A bit. Similarly, the logic diagram shows not 8 bit as a term for solenoid T2, but the ALD and the table shows that as not B bit. Finally, the ILD and the table on the ILD show the C bit as a term in the equation for the CHK solenoid, however the ALD and the IBM 1415 Console manual show this is really not the C bit.
The rest of the pages for the IBM 1415 were uneventful.
Testing of the ALDs in volume IX is now complete. With that all ALD pages for the main CPU and the channels (including the I/O channels E and F) have been tested, some more thoroughly than others. Memory spans volumes IX and X, so memory isn’t done yet.
After that comes the last volume I plan on working on for now, volume X. The main piece is the I/O Selectric console support.
Adventures in Error Land
One of the things that is interesting about the IBM is the extent of error checking. The Core has parity (check bit), but all of the major data paths (called “channels” on the IBM 1410) as well (A, B and Assembly channels, for example). Unfortunately, some of this is not covered in the ILD diagrams. While it is covered in the System Fundamentals manual, the logic actually used on some of the ALD’s is a bit different from channel to channel, even though the end result is essentially the same. In particular, while all of the pages use card type DHL (And-Or-Invert, or And/Nor, if you like), some of the pages use plain old NOR gates in places in combination with NAND gates – resulting in differences in positive +S inputs vs. negative -S inputs, so that I was not able to just copy the test bench code from one channel to the next.
Also, page 18.13.03.1 had an error – combining two outputs with and AND on the ILD when the circuit is actually OR. When the test failed, the reason was apparent, comparing it with others on the same ILD, figure 59.
Page 18.14.06.1 had a different kind of error. The polarity of the signal shown as “+S LOG GT E.2ND+3RD CHK TEST” is incorrect. It is correctly depicted as -S on the destination sheet, 18.14.07.1. The ILD also shows this as Logic Gate F rather than E, even though the ILD for the destination page (on the same ILD sheet) correctly shows Logic Gate E. So, yet another vote of confidence for the testing process. 😉
Set… No, Reset…, No Set…. I’m all Confused
Page 18.14.03.1 presented an interesting challenge. This is the Address Channel Validity check trigger. It is reset via collector pullover of the OFF output when a valid character is present and sets when an invalid character show sup (except during Logic Gate A of a 1401 cycle). It then also has a latch, along with a feedback path besides, to keep it set. That feedback path prevents a valid character from resetting the trigger once set.
But it also has a DC Set via the check test switch. The two are connected to their respective inputs by 4.7K ohm resistors. The interesting situation happens when you think about there being a valid character present (thus the off input is pulled high) when one presses the check test switch (which wants to pull the on input high). If this were ordinary logic levels fed from different gates, this would leave one input being logic 1 (0v) and the other being logic 0 (-12V) and would leave the base on the “on” side in no-man’s land. HOWEVER, the check test switch supplies -V voltage – more than enough to force the “on” side on and the on output to ground (logic 0).
In VHDL, one or the other necessarily takes precedence. When I developed the circuit for the DEZ trigger card type, I set it up with the Off output pullover taking precedence. That has worked fine – until this page.
But that does not mean one ought to reverse it. That might break some other page. For my test bench, I worked around the issue by putting an invalid character up long enough for the trigger to set. It would be interesting to scope this situation on a real machine, though that will never ever happen.
(Oh, and did I forget to mention that Triggers are a Pain? 8D).
Oh, and have I mentioned…
Page 18.14.08.1 presented a challenge. It has a trigger (naturally) with the ubiquitous pull on and pull off connections. Unlike the previous ones, however, this pull off DOT function is driven by two gates instead of just one. The program logic recognizes the case where a single gate pulls on or pulls of a trigger, but not one where more than one gate is involved.
Rather than futzing with the program logic for what appears to be a single case (we’ll see about that), instead I inserted a gate “FXOR” (for faux OR) befoer the DOT function to fix it.
(Oh, and did I forget to mention … never mind. 😉 ).
We Interrupt this program…
Near the end of Volume IX were the ILD pages for interrupt processing. Most of that was straightforward: if interrupts are enabled, and an I/O operation completes (presumably in overlap mode), an interrupt is generated.\
But while there is a section on interrupts in the CPU instructional materials, including some ILD-type diagrams, their coverage is not as thorough as a regular ILD.
There is also a special case for interrupts for unit record equipment, perhaps intended for SPOOL (simultaneous peripheral operation online) support. There is a toggle switch for turning on interrupts for overlapped I/O operations (including 1301 seek), console inquiry, console output, non-overlapped seek and disk device “attention” signals.
Unit record interrupts are special, however: the operator must select one (card reader, punch, printer or paper tape) using a rotary switch, and then push a special priority interrupt button. This generates an initial interrupt – completed I/O turns on subsequent interrupts.
This last one was tricky to test, because it is implemented using a set of three latches – the first one being a “one and only one” latch to handle the button press. (We didn’t ever actually use that on the School of Business IBM 1410).
Chains of latches, especially where the signals are not brought out to the sheet edge are almost as much “fun” to work with as triggers. 😉
Mutually exclusive logic blocks
Memory testing also brought up the first case where I could not test an ALD without disabling one or more logic blocks. In particular a couple of sheets had gates for both feature S10 (10K of memory) and S2 (20K or more of memory), and the logic design was such that they cannot coexist, so I used the application to disable generation of the logic blocks related to feature S10 on those pages. (Other pages may still have both – but in those cases coexistence seemed possible.)
Load Sharing Matrix Switches
While I am testing or at least sort of testing most of the memory related circuits, including the sense amplifiers from a digital point of view, and the drivers for the LSMS units, I am not testing/generating/simulating the LSMS units themselves. This is mostly because each LSMS takes up four logic blocks on an ALD, and I don’t currently have a way to merge more than two logic blocks or merge two that are not vertically adjacent to each other. Finally it would just add complexity to the memory unit when I generate an FPGA to actually simulate the core. Instead I will just simulate Read/Write/Inhibit on 8 bits at a time directly from the storage / memory address register (variously referred to as STAR and MAR – the former in the documentation, the latter in the ALD signal names.
A Sense of Forcing my h-AND
Finally, the ALDs related to sense amplifiers required special treatment. For each bit of each of the possible four memory readout characters on a system with 40K, there are two sense amplifiers, one supporting 5K bits of a core plane – either the 0-4999 or 5000-5999 portions. These gates’ outputs are then connected together, but not using just load resistors. Instead, each sense amplifier card has a diode on the output such that when they are connected together driving a -Y signal level, they comprise an AND gate.
The HDL generation currently supposes that B level DOT functions are AND and that the others are OR (with a per signal level setting). Most cases for Y signal level DOT functions are indeed OR, but not in this case, because of the diodes that are present (anode facing out from the gate). Fortunately, a while back I added the ability to force a given DOT function’s generated logic, so this was easy to deal with.
Volume VIII started off pretty uneventfully, for a while. I did find another page (16.20.02.1) where a couple of gates have their internal connections brought to the edge of the sheet, but those are trivial to fix by adding “faux pins” to the gate definitions and using those on the sheet.
I continue to be somewhat surprised that I haven’t found very many connector errors – a testament to the value of verifying gate and signal use counts on each sheet.
Also, the number of ILD diagrams I have checked off as being completely tested in the CPU section is approaching closure. Of 65 such ILD diagrams, I have completely checked off the diagrams in all but 15 of them. (In addition I have quite a number of additional diagrams of the ILD ilk (i.e., drawn as positive logic with AND and OR gates, etc.).
Page 22.214.171.124 was a bit more interesting. On the surface, it is just a couple of latches. However, the corresponding diagrams on ILD figure 31 were in error. The outputs of these latches go to DOT-ed connection. While they are not like triggers in that they don’t “pull over” the output directly, they DO form part of the feedback loop for the latch, and thus can cause it to set (provided nothing else is keeping it reset). However, the engineer drawing the ILD didn’t take that behavior into account (and it did seem rather odd, just looking at the ILD, to have both a latch and a combinatorial group feeding the same output. ;))
In addition, on that same page, the latch comprised of the gates at 4E and 3E are unusual – the reset portion (4E) is a NAND gate, but at I first I thought that the set portion (3E) was NOR gate thinking that the engineer doing the ILD diagram did not spot it, which caused them to depict it as part of an “OR” to set the latch, when in fact those two inputs are effectively ANDed together.
However, when I ran into the same situation on page 126.96.36.199, the second use of card type YLH in my travels, I got suspicious and took a closer look at the circuit, which has a 3 diode DDTL (0-6V) *AND* circuit feeding an inverter/converter to SDRTL (-12V – 0V) – in other words, a NAND gate. This was actually the third card type where I had made this error – it caused me to go through all the card types I had interpreted as NOR gates to confirm that there were not any more such gaffes.
Page 188.8.131.52 had something else interesting. This is the Complement Latch page. There is also a related signal, “+B COMP ADD A” derived from that latch anded with “ADDER A CH USE T + C” (OR’ed with a couple of other things). The latch is set, among other ways, by the OR of a couple of signals “START COMPL ADD 1” or “START COMPL ADD 2”. Interestingly, “+B COMP ADD A” will also generate its output via (“START COMPL ADD 1” or “START COMPL ADD 2”) and that same “ADDER A CH USE T + C”. Since the effect of the OR part of this would also be setting the latch, it is in a sense redundant. I suspect that this might be in place get the +B COMP ADD A signal up just a tad quicker than the latch sets, by OR’ing it with the pair of signals that are also going to eventually to set the latch.
A “D’Oh” Moment
I had noticed in my travels that a number of signals end in asterisk or have an asterisk near the end. I had seen quite a number of them, particularly as inputs to DOT’ed connections on their destination sheets. But it wasn’t until I got to page 16.50.04.1 where what was logically an identical signal appeared with both a name without an asterisk and one with an asterisk (-B MPLY.MQ.B.B0 and -B MPLY.MQ.B.B0*) that I finally recognized what that actually meant – that those signals are indeed open collector outputs intended to be DOT’ed on their destination sheets. D’Oh. Sheesh – it took me two YEARS to catch on.
(Addendum: There are exceptions – probably when things were changed. Example: Page 17.13.06.1 generates signal “-S SET DOLLAR SIGN * EDIT”. However, this is a driven signal, not open collector and in most places, the “* EDIT” does not appear on the input side – only on page 184.108.40.206 does that signal appear with an asterisk – and it is not dotted. My guess is that originally there was an open collector variant, but they later found they did not need it.)
Signal Names Can Be Misleading
There are a lot of straight-forward if complex combinatorial sheets in this parcel of ALDs, and sometimes there is no corresponding ILD. In such cases I have been using the signal name to drive my test bench, but sometimes those signal names can be misleading. Case in point, on page 16.50.04.1 there is a signal name “-B MPLY.MQ.B.1.B0.BW” which implies Multiply OP and MQ latch and B Cycle and 1st Scan and B Channel 0 and B Channel wordmark. However, when I ran my test, it failed, because, looking at the ALD, it also incorporates the True Latch (usually represented at a “T” in the signal name dot sequence – but missing from this particular signal name.) I suppose that they added this factor somewhere during the design and testing phase, but didn’t want to bother renaming the signal to “-B MPLY.MQ.B.T.1.B0.BW”.
When a Space is NOT a Blank and vice-versa
Came across something interesting on the Edit Translator pages (17.11.*.1). These pages refer to “Blank” and “Space” as different characters. Say whaaaat? Fortunately, the ILD Figure 41.1 contained a hint: “NOT SPACE (NOT &)”. There are four BCD characters that have no number bits (bits 8, 4, 2 and 1 are all 0). “Blank” (no bits), – (Just a B Bit), Cent sign – which is also called “alternate or substitute blank” (just an A bit) and & – also known as “+” and, apparently, as “Space” (just the BA bits). I had been aware of the blank / alternate blank thing, because it appears in the principles of operation, but calling BA—- as anything but ampersand or “+” was a new one on me.
Keep on Learning, Learning, Learning
One of the fascinating things that has been going on throughout this entire project is learning to write test benches. Once I am through it all, I plan to post the generated VHDL on github, and this evolution will be very apparent. Ordinary VHDL of course, with signals, requires a flip flop/register/latch to remember state – they correspond to actual hardware logic signals. The IBM 1410 has a bunch of those latches, and some of them have “control” latches that remember something until the next major cycle comes around. What is more, often those control latches are hidden, i.e., their signals are not brought out on the ALD sheet. This presents a challenge in writing a test bench – because you need to know the state of that control latch from a previous iteration of the test vector to know whether the actual latch whose signal does appear as an ALD output ought to be. Even worse, some of these latches are in a latch loop – using the “visible” latch to “regenerate” the setting into the control latch until some kind of condition is satisfied. Up until today, I had been “remembering” that with code – which made writing the test bench both more intricate and complicated, and less complete as well. Enter another “D’Oh” moment: test benches can and do make use of VHDL variables, which, unlike signals, “remember” – they are like variables in most any other programming language. So, one can remember the *expected* state of the control latch, and then see if that results in the corresponding state of the “visible” latch on the next iteration. Better still, another variable enables the test bench to “remember” the state of the visible latch as well. This makes testing significantly easier and more thorough. The test bench for page 17.12.01.1 shows this new technique in practice. With this technique the latch testing on this page worked perfectly the first time – and was verified with the waveform trace in the simulator. BIG time saver here. Wish I had thought of it sooner.
(With apologies to Dory and Ellen DeGeneres. 😉 ).
-- The variable declarations, VHDL wrapper declarations, etc. etc. are not shown here...
testName := "17.12.01.1 ";
MS_LOGIC_GATE_B_1 <= '0';
MS_LOGIC_GATE_D_1 <= '0';
wait for 30 ns;
MS_LOGIC_GATE_B_1 <= '0';
MS_LOGIC_GATE_D_1 <= '0';
wait for 30 ns;
check1(PS_NOT_0_SUPPRESS,'0',testName,"+S ZS Reset");
check1(MS_NOT_0_SUPPRESS,'1',testName,"-S ZS Reset");
for tt in 0 to 2**10 loop
tv := std_logic_vector(to_unsigned(tt,tv'Length));
d := tv(0);
e := tv(1);
f := tv(2);
g := tv(3);
h := tv(4);
j := tv(5);
k := tv(6);
l := tv(7);
m := tv(8);
n := tv(9);
g1 := g and h and k;
g2 := g1 or (k and l) or m or n;
g3 := d and e;
g4 := (lastNotZSLatch and g2 and e) or g3 or (e and f and k);
-- Note that g4 (gate 4) depends on the state from the previous iteration!!
lastNotZS <= lastNotZSLatch;
-- These two signals are just here so that I can see the variables on the "scope" waveform trace
lastNotZSCtrlA <= lastNotZSCtrl; -- There declarations appear before this "code" nearer the top of the test bench and are not shown
-- Reset Not 0 Suppress Latch
MS_LOGIC_GATE_B_1 <= '0';
wait for 30 ns;
MS_LOGIC_GATE_B_1 <= '1';
wait for 30 ns;
check1(PS_NOT_0_SUPPRESS,'0',testName,"+S ZS Loop Reset");
check1(MS_NOT_0_SUPPRESS,'1',testName,"-S ZS Loop Reset");
-- If Not ZS Ctrl was set last iteration, then set Not ZS Latch now
PS_LOGIC_GATE_C_1 <= '1';
wait for 30 ns;
PS_LOGIC_GATE_C_1 <= '0';
wait for 30 ns;
check1(PS_NOT_0_SUPPRESS,lastNotZSCtrl,testName,"+S ZS From Ctrl");
check1(MS_NOT_0_SUPPRESS,not lastNotZSCtrl,testName,"-S ZS From Ctrl");
-- Reset Not ZS Ctrl This should not affect Not ZS Latch
MS_LOGIC_GATE_D_1 <= '0';
wait for 30 ns;
MS_LOGIC_GATE_D_1 <= '1';
wait for 30 ns;
check1(PS_NOT_0_SUPPRESS,lastNotZSCtrl,testName,"+S ZS From Ctrl Reset ZS Ctrl");
check1(MS_NOT_0_SUPPRESS,not lastNotZSCtrl,testName,"-S ZS From Ctrl Reset ZS Ctrl");
-- Remember the setting of the Not ZS Latch for the next iteration
lastNotZSLatch := PS_NOT_0_SUPPRESS;
-- Now maybe set Not ZS Ctrl
PS_LAST_INSN_RO_CYCLE <= d;
PS_LAST_LOGIC_GATE_1 <= e;
PS_SIG_DIGIT <= f;
PS_1ST_SCAN <= g;
PS_NOT_CTRL_0 <= h;
PS_E_OP_DOT_B_CYCLE_1 <= j;
PS_E_OR_Z_DOT_2ND_SCAN_DOT_EXTENSION <= k;
PS_BLK_0_PUNCT_OR_SIG_DIGIT <= l;
MS_A_CYCLE <= not m;
MS_3RD_SCAN <= not n;
wait for 30 ns; -- Perhaps set Not ZS Ctrl
-- Remember the *expected* state of Not ZS Ctrl for the next iteration
lastNotZSCtrl := g4;
-- Reset the signals before the next iteration
PS_LAST_INSN_RO_CYCLE <= '0';
PS_LAST_LOGIC_GATE_1 <= '0';
PS_SIG_DIGIT <= '0';
PS_1ST_SCAN <= '0';
PS_NOT_CTRL_0 <= '0';
PS_E_OP_DOT_B_CYCLE_1 <= '0';
PS_E_OR_Z_DOT_2ND_SCAN_DOT_EXTENSION <= '0';
PS_BLK_0_PUNCT_OR_SIG_DIGIT <= '0';
MS_A_CYCLE <= '1';
MS_3RD_SCAN <= '1';
Volume VII started off interesting right off the bat with page 15.49.01.1. First of all, I ran into more cases where “B” level signals fed into DOT functions, and recognized these situations are ANDs because the gates transistors go to 0V when on (logic 0, rather than one) and go to 6V when off (logic 1, rather than 0). Any single transistor turning on is enough to bring the signal to logic 0 – a logical AND. This triggered a move to have logic generation recognize when a DOT function is feeds a gate with a “B” level input or feeds a sheet edge with a B level signal, and makes it an AND – which I then later changed to snagging the logic function to use out of the signal levels table.
Also, on this same page, I discovered that I had mis-interpreted the logic function for two logic gates on card type DND as NOR, when they are actually NAND. As a result of investigating what to do about page 15.50.05.1, I also discovered I had goofed on card type YLJ as well, confirmed by comparing the logic on page 220.127.116.11 with the ILD figure 30. (Later I also found the same miss-interpretation for card type YLH).
Trouble in River City, page 15.50.*.1
Page 15.50.05.1 (and, really, all of the pages 15.50.01.1 – 15.50.09.1) are problematic, because they are not for the IBM 1410 Accelerator feature. This feature uses a fair amount of DTL (IBM DDTL) logic to speed things up. The card location diagram for panel 11C3 shows the DTL cards, but the ALD’s I have don’t match, and generally use SDRTL. For the most part, it doesn’t matter to the actual logic that I will produce for the FPGA. Rather than figure out exactly what the DDTL would be, I have been deferring to the ALD’s. However, on page 15.50.05.1, I ran into a problem. that page takes two inputs not shown on the ALD to produce an output which is also not shown on the ALD (or ILD, for that matter) and that signal is used on page 18.104.22.168 – which is for the accelerator feature.
The input signals are: “-B B CH MIN+INV PLUS SIGN GATED” (which I will refer to as signal “A”) and “-B B CH PLU+IN MIN SIGN GATED” (which I will refer to as signal “B”). The page also produces an output signal, “+B B CH PL+INV MIN SIGN GATED”, which I will refer to as signal “C”). Note that the wording of the output signal is slightly different than the input signal “B”, and is also +B vs -B.
Page 22.214.171.124 also uses signal “A” “-B B CH MIN+INV PLUS SIGN GATED” which originates on page 16.16.06.1, and it is , logically speaking (B CH Minus and Use B Ch Sign) or (B Ch Plus and Use Inv B Ch Sign) as one of many signals that can set the NOT Zone C Bit.
The ILD for page 126.96.36.199 does not match the ALD – it shows a pair of signals used among others in a large “OR” arrangement to set the ASSM Ch Zone C Bit: B CH Plus Sign Gated and B CH Invert Minus Sign Gated – which clearly matches signal “C”), and does not show “A” at all.
The upshot is, the equation for signal “C” might be as simple as C <= not B, but it is quite possible that it should be C <= not B and A. That latter equation would be equivalent in most circumstances, should not be harmful, and would automatically prevent this signal from setting the Zone C bit when its partner (signal not A) is setting the NOT Zone C bit – so that is what I chose to do.
To make that happen, I “fudged” some gates. I had on sheet 15.50.05.1 a DND gate (B level inverter) and a YLJ (NAND, B level input S level output) from the card location chart (which is for the accelerator feature) that I was not actually using as they don’t appear on the ALD. That combination produces NOT(NOT “B” and “A”) – the desired logic, but at a “-S” level. But 188.8.131.52 expects a “+B” level input. So I “tacked” on a gate “borrowed” from card type YLK 11C3F05. YLK is a an inverter accepting “-S” level input and producing “+B” level output. I doubt that this is how it was actually done, but since my ALD is using mostly SDRTL (“S” level) logic, and there aren’t any accelerator feature ILD’s, I went with this approach. Time will tell if it works.
Back to the more mundane stuff
On page 15.62.01.1 I discovered a signal name error. Usually I catch these the first time I come across them. This one was a little different, because the origin page, being for the 1311 disk, is not present in my print set. On page 15.62.01.1 I had miss-read the signal as “-S RECEIVER LATCH*1311” when the correct signal name is “-S RECOVER LATCH*1311” – the latter also appeared on an earlier page as well. Easy fix.
Page 15.62.03.1, which controls the strobe of I/O data was a tiny adventure. First, although the VDHL I wrote to handle SMS gate type TAM has the capability of being forced reset by an attached DOT function, I hadn’t told the database to assign that function to the faux pin “T”. In addition, both of the triggers on this page have their gates tied to ground (since these are SDRTL, that means LOGIC ONE), but the database did not reflect that – an easy fix. Finally, the ILD figure 44 has an error where it shows the various buffer strobes going into an OR which feeds the forced reset on the E Ch Strobe trigger, when in fact they feed into the clock (gated set) input on the trigger. It was pretty obvious when the test I wrote based on the ILD failed the first time that forced reset came into effect.
Page 184.108.40.206, the last page in this volume, also had a signal name error: there was an extra blank on the signal name “-C CPU TO CH TAU C BIT” which prevented group generation from generating a bit vector for it. Easily fixed. (FYI, TAU on the IBM 1410 stands for Tape Adapter Unit).
Triggers are a Pain
In working on page 15.62.04.1 I was reminded that the SMS trigger circuits are a pain. I had already dealt with the fact that another single gate “DOT-ed” with an on or off output can force that output on (either the “on” output or the “off” output can be so affected.) A second issue, though, is that some inputs are typically AC coupled – edge triggered, if you will. That means tracking state, because once an AC coupled input has reached logic 1, it cannot trigger again until it goes back to logic 0. I had dealt with the edge triggering before, but on this page my test tripped up because the variables that were tracking the edge were undefined. That bit me for the first time on this page, because I had neglected to force the trigger counters (4 of them, as there are 4 AC inputs, each requiring tracking 3 FPGA clock pulses to look for a logic-one-going pulse) to reset when the trigger is forced to a 1 or 0 – just initializing them to logic 0 didn’t help. This issue cropped up with card type TAM, which I fixed, but could also happen with card type DEY or DEZ (and maybe others I haven’t run into yet) as well. Did I mention that triggers are a pain? 😉
And, indeed, page 15.62.05.1 had the same issue, with card type SMS_DEY. Did I mention that triggers are a pain? 😉
Another thing about triggers: sometimes they are daisy-chained together, which means one has to be very careful about the relationship between test assertions and clock pulses. In a couple of tests I had to save what the state of the first trigger in a chain WAS before clocking in the 2nd trigger, which sets the 2nd trigger based on the state of the first one, but also clears the first one. Did I mention that triggers are a pain? 😉
Work to do merging switches
Not surprisingly, several switches on the IBM 1410 are multi-deck affairs. Right now the HDL group generation code does not recognize them, such that if a group contains multiple decks of the same switch, it gets it wrong. What it ought to do is recognize when the name of the switch and its number of positions match, and use a common bit vector for them. Until this gets fixed, I have to either test such pages separately, or tweak the generated group and test bench by hand.